“The forest which has tigers should never be cut, nor should the tigers be chased away from the forest.”
Mahabharata
I was drawn to animals from an early age, my fascination starting with the elephant whose pencil sketch I saw on my green coloured cover of Titagarh Paper Mills manufactured exercise book. I was also drawn to the she-wolf whose picture of suckling Romulus and Remus, the founders of Rome, appeared in my first history books. But what interested me more was the whole lot of myths, legends and symbolism woven around animals.
I have always been bemused to see fashionable women judge you not by what you are but by the traits of the animal of your sun sign ? Such animalistic evaluation makes one feel kind of weird but then I guess this is what life is all about. But let me confess, I, too, have fallen prey to it and religiously check up, even before the menu card, the paper mat in Bar-b-Q restaurant in Park Street, to check up which animal denotes the year I was born in the Chinese calendar.
I have always been bemused to see fashionable women judge you not by what you are but by the traits of the animal of your sun sign ? Such animalistic evaluation makes one feel kind of weird but then I guess this is what life is all about. But let me confess, I, too, have fallen prey to it and religiously check up, even before the menu card, the paper mat in Bar-b-Q restaurant in Park Street, to check up which animal denotes the year I was born in the Chinese calendar.

Animals have been assigned various traits which are found or desirable in human beings and have inspired many martial arts and military tactics.They have also inspired analytical tools for determining types of personality of human beings: the Myers- Briggs test is a tool to ascertain what is an individual's animal personality from a clutch consisting of owl, fox, sloth, lion, deer, octopus, cat, otter, wolf, dolphin, honey bee, beaver, dog, meerkat, parrot and elephant.
However, of even greater interest is depiction of a country's ideal symbolically through a mascot, called the National animal which good quizzers had to remember : the US has the Bald Eagle, Germany the Black Eagle , New Zealand the Kiwi, Nepal the cow and so and and so forth. Some countries, fearful of the wrath of other animals, and probably of the gods they may represent, have, in addition to the National animal, chosen a clutch of other animals under different categories. India celebrates its faunal pluralism by
accommodating many- so even though the national animal is the tiger, the peacock is the national bird, the Ganges Dolphin the National Aquatic Animal, the Elephant the National Heritage Mammal and the Grey langur as the National mammal ( as if the tiger, elephant and the Ganges Dolphin are not mammals!).
accommodating many- so even though the national animal is the tiger, the peacock is the national bird, the Ganges Dolphin the National Aquatic Animal, the Elephant the National Heritage Mammal and the Grey langur as the National mammal ( as if the tiger, elephant and the Ganges Dolphin are not mammals!).
An interesting thing I found was the competitiveness between the tiger and the lion, primarily , if not solely in India, because this country is the only one where the two co-exist and also probably because its people have been called argumentative by its most illustrious Nobel prize winner for economics . Let us dig deep into history and see how the cult of these two magnificent beasts have emerged, and how the importance has seen a see- saw fluctuation.
Paradoxically, even though the lion would lose at least nine times out of ten to a tiger in a duel, it is not the more powerful of the two which is associated, by very many cultures ( including England which does not have lions), as part of imperial symbolism.


But where the tiger would have felt real bad, cheated and exclaimed a "WTF" would have been to see itself being beaten by the lion in the world of ideas and symbols in India which was the only country where the two co-existed. To begin with, the tiger came first, about 12000 years ago from East Asia and occupied huge swathes of the country. Its presence has been confirmed by the Harrappan seals, even as the lion was absent. The lion came much later, after the decline of the Harrappan culture, after the drying of Saraswati and associated climatic changes made north west India much drier than what it was during Harrappan times. The earliest artefact depicting a lion in the subcontinent, a golden goblet , was found in Balochistan, and is , therefore, thought to have come from Iran.
But once the lion became a familiar animal in the subcontinent, it was quickly appropriated by Indian culture - becoming a symbol of royal power and bravery. The use of lions in symbols and signage gained importance in India from the second half of the first millennium, with the rise of the great Hindu kingdoms- the mahajanpadas, Mauryas and Guptas. Piyadassi, or Ashok the Great, installed the lions on top of his pillars, and the lion continued to be the favoured animal of the Guptas, Firozeshah Tughlaq , down to the Mughals and even the British. The Sarnath Lion on top of the Dharam Chakra is the National Emblem of free India. The word for throne in Sanskrit and many Indian languages is singhasana or the Lion's seat, thus making the Lion and the king virtually inseparable.

Meanwhile, in India, the tiger was reduced to localised importance as the vehicle of Lord Ayappan in Kerala, amongst the Warli tribe in Maharsahtra who worship Vaghdevata, the tiger god, and was held in reverence in Nagaland. Its major importance lay in the form of tiger skin the rishi or the yogi preferred to sit on as it denoted creative energy and conquest of lust and the mind. The tiger suffered further due to organised shooting, which along with holding lavish Durga Puja celebrations, were two major ploys by natives to cultivate the British . While the Durga Pujas prospered and proliferated, the tiger population saw a steep decline. When the nation became free in 1947, it was the Lion, and not the Tiger, which was declared as the national animal of India.
Fortunately, in 1973, the environmentalists, alarmed at the decline in tiger population, replaced the lion as the national animal with the tiger. It was a great move and put the focus on saving the tiger and its habitat and brings in substantial foreign exchange because the tiger also fulfils the same function what the monarchy does in Britain : brings in the tourists. However, even before the
environmentalists, the Reserve Bank of India had done its two bit for the tiger by replacing the lion which had featured along with a palm tree as the symbol in the original East India Double Mohur, with that of the tiger.
Fortunately, in 1973, the environmentalists, alarmed at the decline in tiger population, replaced the lion as the national animal with the tiger. It was a great move and put the focus on saving the tiger and its habitat and brings in substantial foreign exchange because the tiger also fulfils the same function what the monarchy does in Britain : brings in the tourists. However, even before the
environmentalists, the Reserve Bank of India had done its two bit for the tiger by replacing the lion which had featured along with a palm tree as the symbol in the original East India Double Mohur, with that of the tiger.
There is no denying the fact the tiger held its ground as the leading symbol of imperial power in China, Korea and also became the national animal of Malaysia, South Korea and Bangladesh. It came to be associated with high virility, though this led to its widespread hunting for the aphrodisiacal powers it held out. Its robustness accounted for the many countries of East Asia, viz., Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong, who maintained high levels of economic growth and rapid industrialisation from 1960s to 1990s onwards, to be called Asian tigers.
But even then, in many of these countries, the tiger was forced to share space with the lion ( which was absolutely non existent here) as a result of the activities of Indian Buddhist and Hindu missionaries. Buddhist missionaries introduced the lions to China, Indonesia, Cambodia and Burma. The stylised depictions of the beast in these countries is the result of the artists 'unfamiliarity with the sight of the beast. The lion plays an important role in the Mahavamsa, a Pali epic , which is the foundation myth of the Sinhalese ( sinhala or the lion people) people of Sri Lanka. What could have been most definitely a tiger was mistaken as a lion by Sang Nila Uttama, a 14th century Sumatran Malay prince, who on the advice of his Chief Minister named the island Singapore- Singa which was Malay for lion and pur for city!


So what is your pick, the Tiger or the Lion? Pi or Lion King? Or should we settle in for a compromise formula and have either the liger or tigon? Or you think that it is more important to save both the beasts and not quibble over symbols? Do you think that lion had an unfairly long innings of pre- eminence because the royalty , whose male members were slothful, identified with the beast who moved around with his harem and ate of his lionesses' efforts? Or do you think that the tiger represents the way we humans want to live our lives- without inhibitions, with our instincts and passion?
Or should we push aside both and make the Indian Crab the national animal of India?