It was probably 1972-73 or a year later. The East Zone Inter University Cricket tournament was being hosted by Patna University . Semi finals. Patna University versus Sagar University ,Madhya Pradesh. The hosts usually played at the Engineering College ground. Sagar 114 all out in the first innings, Patna falling a run behind. The partisan crowd became restless, umpires were threatened, and when Patna batted in the second innings, the crowd ate up a couple of meters of ground inside the boundary to make it shorter and intimidate the opposition fielders . Patna finally won, actually they even went on to beat Calcutta University in the finals for the first time though later when the All India Inter Zonal matches were played, Patna were thrashed by Bangalore University who rode on a stylish century by Michael Dalvi. Probably Delhi University , captained by Mohinder Amarnath won the Rohinton Baria Trophy.
To come back to the Patna- Sagar clash. It was rumoured that the visitors went back not only with a defeat but also with a lot of black-eyes, bruises and gashes for having had the gall to overtake Patna in the first innings. This wasn’t quite contrary to the image one had of Patna University guys, I never thought there were bigger rangbaajs among students than the bhaiyyas of Patna University. However, a year later, when Patna University went to Ravi Shankar University to play the inter university hockey tournament, the honours were returned with interest . I remember spotting Mohan Bhaiya, the Big Dada of our mohalla , returning with his right eye bandaged, the left hand in in a sling and in acute and embarrassing pain as the knife inflicted wounds on the haunches had not healed for quite some time. This was my first lesson in the shifting world of home advantage which one sees all around.


Nowhere the game of numbers is as dominant as it is in the world of Indian politics, that wonderful vocation which, through a white khadi membrane, osmotically acquires all that it reaches out to in the Survival of the Craftiest. Numbers have given rise to such props like Majority and Minority that politics would be nakedly incomplete without them, as it would be without Swiss banks and vote banks. For far too long these props have been used as fixed, cast-in-stone, frozen- in- time -and-space constructs by a large majority of political commentators - be they of the old EPW or Seminar type or of the burgeoning ranks of paid media or even celebrities from the world of cinema, award returnees and academia. For long unchallenged, there is now a frontal assault on them,especially after demographic changes resulted in majoritarianization of minorities in large parts of the country, from Right- wing and socially conservative intellectuals and many what have been dubbed as fringe elements, khaki knickerwalas ( who could be undergoing a sartorial revolution in a short while to a become full patloonwalas) , Akhand Bharat dreamers and the back- to- the- Vedas and put-the -clock-back scientists.The latter argue that majority and minority are a matter of context in terms of time and space, almost like the shifting sand dunes - what is a majority at the national level may not be so at the state or district levels.

The train was filled with kar sevaks returning from Ayodhya when a few bogies were burnt by a riotous mob of Muslims at Godhra. The other day I was reading an extract from Bhisham Sahini’s We Have Arrived In Amritsar in my friend Amitava Kumar's column in the magazine Brunch about a frail and nervous- looking babu. Having tolerated barbs and jibes by three Pathan traders while the train was passing through predominantly Muslim areas , he takes out an iron rod in vengeance and hits a poor Muslim trying to enter the train which had by now reached Sikh Amritsar. The Sonbhadra Express in 1982-83 , on way to Patna after yet another vacation in Delhi University had begun , was filled up with Patna- bound students from a Delhi college founded by Late Shri Krishan Dassji Gurwale, just across the street in front of St. Stephen’s College. A few boys picked up a small fight with someone from Aligarh. It was a kind of moving home advantage for the Patna- bound guys but they had miscalculated. This person from Aligarh who was neither Muslim nor homophobic, managed to send word to Aligarh . When the train stopped at Aligarh, the Bihari boys were given a sound thrashing, the stories told with much mirth and glee by the other Biharis who had managed to escape detection, either by hiding inside the toilets or switching from hum to mai .

I vividly remember the matches in Patna University and the way we used to make the field smaller for them. It is true that majority psyche runs everywhere.
ReplyDeleteFlagging it as the underlying reason for so many social issues is the real marvel. Probably this can come handy in resolving some of the social disorders.
Something refreshing again, after a long break. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThe magnitude of the packed stadium named Eden Gardens once made it India's happy hunting grounds. Some visitors, like the late Tony Grieg, knew the tricks of keeping the crowds entertained though boring with the bat. There are two aspects where number (or headcount matters) - one is the ballot day in democracies, and the other manifests in mob violence. On the home advantage, on another flavor, I remember an instance in Singapore when a local person, having returned home from the US after a decade was saying how happy was to be back. Not just homecoming - it was, in his words, because he felt there was racism in the US and not in Singapore. My immediate thought was that being with the majority or minority was what mattered when taking refuge under 'racial discrimination' - he was on the majority side of the table. The photo of Mark Twain brought back this memory.
Is the territorial dominance something for all living beings? Animals too are protective about their territories. So, riding the wave of majority may be a primitive instinct - might justify the rowdiness from mobs in home territory.
That's a good observation, about the primitive instinct. Probably the politicians understand it much better.
DeleteIn those militancy days in Punjab, once while flying to Kolkata from Hyderabad I opted for a smoking seat as those days, there used to be a few earmarked seats for smokers. As i lighted a cigarette after seat-belt sign was switched off, someone from across shouted to ask me to stop smoking. Taken aback and a bit upset with his rude tone, I protested and reminded him that I was well within the rules to smoke. He looked at me with a killer glint in his eye and said "Amritsar mein pee ke dikha". The tyranny of majority as I would call it, will continue to oppress the mankind universally. We are no exception here.Be it Jats in Haryana or Patels in Gujrat,the 'small, silent and subdued minority' will continue to suffer. We shall continue to play 'home & away' games. A very incisive and well written piece Vivek. And timely too.
ReplyDeleteGreat topic you have chosen for a national essay competition Vivek!!
ReplyDeleteAnd so well written as usual!!
Stay the course, bro.
Once again a silver bullet from the nozzle of a golden gun .
ReplyDeleteHumorous , hillarious with its belly jiggle effect ....risking the stomach muscles cramp up due certain burst of laughters .
Enjoyed it bhaiya ����������...keep writing .
My posted smileys turned into question marks after posting ...Fyi 🔝
ReplyDeleteWell written Vivek. All kudos. KC
ReplyDeleteIts a wonderful piece of literary art. Charm of selected words throughout compete with the charm of expressions. Expressions like "survival of the craftiest", "without Swiss bank and vote bank", " majoritarianization of the minorities" are so judiciously accurate. Words emanating through lips and cascading through fingers with effortless ease. So well written. Keep writing buddy.
ReplyDeleteA bitter pill coated so well in the sugar of delightful prose. The very fact that people still have to seek the comfort of a majority, retuning viciousness for viciousness is a sad comment of the kind of Nation we have become. Not certainly what our founding fathers would have envisaged. Not a very edifying comment on the much touted 'Rich Indian' culture either.
ReplyDeleteThe play on words added much needed colour to a bleak picture.